WRITE IT . . . SHARE IT . . . HEAR IT BACK
You seem to be using an older version of Internet Explorer. This site requires Internet Explorer 8 or higher. Update your browser here today to fully enjoy all the marvels of this site.
Listen to the Reader
womens sports
By: Caines
Women, who participate in team sports during their school
years, enjoy the benefits of a healthier and practical view of
society and their role in it. Since young female athletes
learn to perform in a team setting, they gain a greater
understanding of social order and an individual’s role
within that structure. In that setting individual performance
is seen not so much as personal achievements but as a valued
contribution to the team. Professional jobs mirror that
structure. Physically, sports provide a positive alternative
to the social status which typically offers women less active
roles in society. Girls involved in sports are less likely to
be statistics of social afflictions as teen pregnancy and drug
and alcohol abuse. Their body image is more positive, since
they push themselves physically. The results are that they
usually enjoy greater health and their body image is usually
dictated by performance in sports rather than images dictated
by the media. Involvements in competition, help girls
develop greater self-esteem. Athletes perform under pressure.
Overcoming pressure and achieving personal goals within that
setting help female athletes establish themselves as winners,
who understand the level of effort it takes to achieve goals.
That same self-esteem will undoubtedly be the difference
between achievers and the ones can barely maintain
professional jobs.
Schools should put more money toward sports since team sports
are the best opportunities for young athletes to learn
invaluable life lessons. Sports are as vital a part of a
young person’s education as music, mathematics, art and
reading. There are no additional programs supported by
schools which would teach young people tangible skillsets,
such as coordination, cooperation, performance and pursuit of
excellence. Sports would also neutralize additional problems
most schools encounter. A well developed and funded sports
program in any school help the institution develop and
identity in the community, conference, and nation. A
well-funded school program helps attract better student
athletes since the program traditionally creates more
scholarship money for non-athletic programs.
Women’s professional sports don’t do as well since
each program is seen as pioneering. It is becoming
increasingly difficult to obtain sponsorship, funding, venues
and recruiting for women’s sports. If there is no
natural path to professional sports, from high school and
college, then it becomes virtually impossible to recruit
retain and pay professional women athletes. In many
instances, the highest level for specific types of women
sports is amateur. There are few professional leagues to
help establish competition, sponsorship and salaries. As an
amateur, the collegiate is able to perform in the Olympics,
but has to compete in the world stage only every four years.
It is not until the Olympics that most of them can get
sponsors or have some of their expenses paid. Often, the
Olympics mark the end of the line for Women athletes and
notoriety and fame come by way of product sponsorship.
Without leagues and conferences, the glass ceiling in
women’s professional sports is reached in college. This
all that has been said I say for school to not only put
money for sport but do a little bit more for the women so
we can have equal benefits as the men do such as better
view and thought process of society.
Comments
Corrie
You have obviously put a lot of thought into your arguments for financially supporting female sports in education. You organized your thoughts to lay your foundation and your conclusions.
- October 10, 2014
- ·
Will
Well, honestly, this is a very well written piece, and many can agree with the opinion of its content. My only problem is . . . why not write your own article? Why cut and paste from some outside source? What's the point? You obviously did not write this.
- October 14, 2014
- ·
Poll Results
Refresh
-
Is It Interesting? 3 Vote(s)
73.3333333333%
-
Are the sentences smooth? 3 Vote(s)
93.3333333333%
-
Is the narrative voice appropriate? 3 Vote(s)
100%
-
Are the word choices good? 3 Vote(s)
93.3333333333%
-
Is the dialogue believable (if any)? 3 Vote(s)
40%
Founded by Steve & Judy
Well, honestly, this is a very well written piece, and many can agree with the opinion of its content. My only problem is . . . why not write your own article? Why cut and paste from some outside source? What's the point? You obviously did not write this.